DX Engineering
SEARCH
Type a part number or description.
Items in Cart: 0 Now Available! Check Shipping Rates Before You Order! Complete Order Checkout, Including Daily Low-Cost International Shipping.
DX Engineering Catalog
What's New?
Vertical Antennas & Systems
Vertical Antenna Parts
COMTEK SYSTEMS
Hustler Antennas
Amplifiers, Tuners, Microphones, Station Accessories
Aluminum Tubing
Saddle Clamps & Mounting Hardware
Yagi Antenna Parts
HEXX Antenna Kits & Components
Wire Antennas & Components
Mobile Antennas Accessories & Parts
Receiving Antennas Systems & Components
Baluns, UNUNs & Feedline Current Chokes
Antenna Switches
Lightning Protectors Grounding Systems
Coax, Cable, Assemblies, Ladder Line
Antenna Tools
ARRL Publications
DX Engineering Apparel
Gift Certificates
Clearance Department Up to 50% off!
Employment Opportunities
Prize Contribution Rules
Links
Tech Info
Contact Us
Gift Certificate Status
Site Map
Sign up to receive news and specials by email
How to Build a Yagi Antenna That Works
How to Build A Yagi Antenna That Works

Paul, NO8D

DXE Test Tower

With the proliferation of Yagi design programs like AO, YO, EZNEC, Yagi Mechanical, etc. everybody who has a computer has the ability to design a well performing Yagi antenna.

Many of us have spent hours before the computer screen tuning and changing things until we have the perfect antenna for our purposes. Then we turn off the computer and start looking at antenna catalogs to find one that might come close to what we want and can afford.

Yes, there is a difference between designing an antenna on a rainy Saturday afternoon and actually getting it built and working. But it may not be as big a difference as you think.

Let’s analyze the situation.

Most of us don’t have an unlimited budget for antennas. Plus, there is the basic fear of “What if I go through all of this and the antenna doesn’t work?” I’ll be left with a useless pile of aluminum, become the butt of jokes from my Ham friends and stand accused of squandering finances by my spouse.

We’ve all been there! And no one wants to go there again!

On the other hand, most, if not all of us can point with pride at something that we have built from scratch that turned out so well that we show it to everyone that shows up at the door.

So, think about it. What were the major differences between the things that turned out to be a source of pride, versus some other project that ultimately was hauled away by the junk man?

For me, the major differences were and are:

  1. I had fully analyzed the problem so I knew what I needed to accomplish. I didn’t decide as I went along.
  2. I knew my Time Budget: I had arranged things with the family.
  3. I knew my Money Budget and the project fit into it.
  4. I knew what I was doing or I had excellent instructions either from a trusted book or from a friend. Maybe I even had the friend there.
  5. I had the correct parts ahead of time – I didn’t try to substitute or cobble something. Saving $5.00 and gaining a problem or an eyesore just isn’t a good tradeoff.
  6. I had the correct tools.
Oh, one more thing – I tried to make it look attractive. WHAT?

I learned a long time ago that in competition where machinery is involved, the winner was usually also one of the most attractive entrants. Don’t believe me? Look at NASCAR or NHRA Drag Racing or even RoboWars. Check out the winners.

This is not beauty for beauty’s sake. In order to achieve an attractive result, you will be forced to observe the details of what you are doing. Make it look like it belongs in the Winner’s Circle and you stand a better chance of getting there.

More on Tools

As with any other worthwhile endeavor, certain tools are necessary. Consider, that if you buy an antenna from an antenna manufacturer that it doesn’t come pre-assembled; you still need some tools to put it together. So, it really gets down to how many more tools you will need to build your own design.

For this project you will need only a few more than you would need to merely assemble the antenna from a kit. We’ll get into exactly what they are a little later.

OK - What’s the Real Problem? And the Answer…

The real problem boils down to getting all the correct parts necessary to put the design together on your tower without having to machine special items.

It can be really discouraging to get half-way through a project only to find that due to non-familiarity with some aspect of the hardware that you have backed yourself into a corner and now you require a custom machined piece.

So, the answer is building that antenna with off-the-shelf pieces. I will show you how to do that.

Getting Started

So, let’s take a look at just what is needed in order to get that Yagi antenna design off the computer and onto your tower with a minimum and hand-wringing and cash outlay.

First you need to make two basic decisions:

1 – What is the frequency that this Yagi will operate on?

2 – What is the wind speed that the antenna should tolerate without collapsing?

The first is easy, or it should be – Do you want a 6m beam that can be used with that new transceiver or are you looking for a replacement for the 15-meter antenna that blew away last winter? This will determine the length of the elements and the boomlength.

While you’re thinking about that, take a look at the graph below. It tells you the maximum gain attainable from a Yagi antenna based on boomlength. Also, notice that the gain is listed in dBi, which is defined as the gain of an antenna over an isotropic (point) source. In order to convert to dBd or gain over a dipole you must subtract 2.15 dB. So, for instance an antenna that has an 8 foot boom on 10 meters, which amounts to .23 wavelengths, can at most have about an 8.1 dBi gain -- or 5.95 dBd gain – 5.95 db gain over a dipole.

On the other hand, an antenna that has a 12-foot boom on 10 meters, which amounts to .34 wavelengths, can at most have about a 9.2 dBi gain -- or 7.05 dBd gain.

So, this graph should help you decide how long to make the boom.

Yagi Gain Graph
Figure 2. Graph from Yagi Antenna Design, written by Dr. James L. Lawson, W2PV, published by ARRL. Used with permission.


The second question might be a little harder. Keep in mind that most antennas designed for the Amateur community seem to be rated for about 75 mph. There are exceptions and some are even rated at over 100 mph. The point being that you could design for a 75 mph wind survivability and be neck and neck with a lot of the ones that you might otherwise buy. In fact, one of the ham magazines sells it’s own brand of antennas and according to a graph on their website, they will withstand only about 50mph. That could possibly be a little low for some locations. Check with your local airport for wind speeds in your area.

Software Design Tools

OK – how do you figure out how to design an antenna for a certain wind speed? Well, you could go to engineering school and study the theory of cantilevered beams or you could just go to the DX Engineering website and purchase a copy of Yagi Mechanical, which will allow you to design the antenna elements to resonate at a specific frequency and to withstand the wind speed that you specify.

The part that attaches the element to the boom is, quite naturally, called the Boom-to-Element Bracket. Keep in mind what size element the Boom-to-Element Bracket will accept since that will be the largest size that you will want to specify in your element design. Also, keep in mind what is the smallest size aluminum that is available since that will be the smallest diameter that you will want to specify. Typically, the most economical way to design the element is to use single thickness tubing (.058 wall) for all of the sections. Later, if you can’t make it long enough without exceeding the specs of the aluminum (35,000 psi for 6063 aluminum or 40,000 for 6061 aluminum), then increase the thickness of the largest section you can use and try again.

If you slide an additional piece of .058 wall tubing inside the largest section you will be able to make it longer without exceeding the yield strength of the metal at your specified wind speed. Thanks to Yagi Mechanical, you won’t have to actually do this with metal – you can try out whatever configuration suits your fancy right on the site and it won’t cost you a thing.

When you finish you will have the element dimensions and taper schedule that you can take directly to your Yagi Design Program, hereafter to be called your YDP.

Yagi Mechanical will have also provided you with the correct overlap of the individual sections of the element.

You can also use Yagi Mechanical to determine the diameter and thickness of the boom that you can use given your boom length and wind speed. Just treat the boom like an element and realize that the program looks at just one-half of the boom (or element) when it is doing its analysis.

Your YDP will adjust the last section of the element to get the total length of the element to be correct for the antenna that you are designing. Luckily, basic physical laws dictate that this section is the longest of all the pieces so it is available for adjustment.

However, the reflectors of most Yagis are about 4-5% longer than necessary to be resonant at the working frequency of the antenna. What this means is that when you are using Yagi Mechanical that the target frequency should be about 4-5% lower than the working frequency of the antenna. Then your YDP will shorten the end of all of the elements instead of shortening the director and lengthening the reflector, which could reduce the wind speed survivability of that longest element.

OK – Let’s design and build an antenna!

You know, when 10m is hot, all you need to work around the world is a wet string. When you really need a good antenna is when conditions are not so good. The last time that I checked the Solar Flux values were about 130. So, how about a 3 element Yagi for 10 meters?

If 10m isn’t your chosen band just follow along and the make the suitable adjustments to the figures for the antenna that YOU want to build.

First, go to the DX Engineering website (http://www.dxengineering.com) purchase a copy of Yagi Mechanical, which is available for download from the website.

Read, the Yagi Mechanical manual to thoroughly familiarize yourself with the abilities of the program and how to input the data.

Open the software and click on the “Design Element” button.

You are now presented with a hypothetical element that resonates at 13.922 MHz and has a wind survivability of 90 mph and uses tubing between .375 inch OD and 1.25 inch OD. Not what we need for a 10m beam.

Since I’ve done this before I’ll use a number of “educated guesses”.

We are going to need a maximum OD of .875 inch to fit into the available Boom to Element Brackets. The smallest OD 6063 aluminum tubing that I have seen is .375 inch OD, so that is the smallest size that we can use.

We will assume a wind velocity of 80 mph.

Let’s assume a lowest frequency of about 28.0 MHz. We then reduce that frequency by about 5% to find the resonant frequency of the reflector which is the longest element and hence the most sensitive to wind. Adjusting the element section lengths will give us a resonant frequency of 26.440 MHz and the screen will look like this.

10M Element Specs


Notice that each section stress is below the yield stress of the material (35,000 psi), the smallest diameter is .375 inch and the largest is .875 inch. The total lengths are 2 inches more than the exposed lengths for adequate overlap.

Incidentally, these numbers represent one side of the element. Total length of the element is twice that shown.

Notice that the .875-inch section is just 6 inches long and consists of 3 thickness of .058-wall aluminum tubing to get down to the next section of tubing which is the .5-inch size. Hence, the .174-inch wall thickness. In other words, for this frequency and wind load you don’t need anything thicker than the .5-inch tubing but since the Boom-to-Element Bracket is made in just one size, we use some inexpensive tubing to get down to the correct size.

An alternative method would be to start out with a complete stick of .875 tubing 144 inches long (72 inches on a side) and slide a 33-inch section of .75-inch tubing inside that. This will work but if you put that Yagi Mechanical you’ll find that you are using a lot more aluminum (and money) than necessary.

OK – now take this taper schedule into your YDP and get the finished lengths of the elements to achieve the exact performance that you expect from your Yagi.

Here are the element schedules that I came up with for my ultimate design, which calls for an 11’10” boom length and will be built on a 12-foot boom.


Taper Schedule


Below is a sketch of the elements described in the Taper Schedule.

Element Taper Schedule Sketch


Here’s what my YDP thought of my design:

YDP Graphs


Not too bad – about 6 dbd gain and more than 20 db f/b ratio over most of the frequency range and approaching 30 db at the peak. SWR curve looks pretty normal for a 3 element Yagi.

OK – now time to pick out some hardware and build it:

DX Engineering has some new Insulated Boom-to-Element Brackets, (DXE-BEB-2) that will fill the bill here. They will fit a 2-inch boom, which is just about right for a 10-meter antenna.

The maximum diameter of the element that we designed above is .875 inch, which coincidentally is the size that fits the BEB-2. The whole thing bolts together with the stainless steel hardware and attaches securely to the boom with a very stout clamp.

Here is a picture of the BEB-2.

DXE-BEB-2

As you can see it comes in 2 pieces and clamps together with DXE stainless steel hardware. It insulates the element from the boom so that you don’t need to adjust the element length to compensate for a metal mounting bracket.

There is a very important distinction between building a beam with insulated brackets and the all-metal (sometimes called the Plumbers Delight) bracket method. The all-metal construction will almost always require that the element lengths be adjusted from that predicted by your YDP to compensate for the element widening and shortening effect that a metal mounting plate will have. If this is not done the antenna will probably still be a good antenna – just not on the frequency that you designed it for!

There are formulas for this (many formulas…) that attempt to determine just how much the length of the element needs to be changed. I am sure that at least some of them come close to being correct, but I would rather eliminate the need to modify the elements altogether.

For this reason, I have chosen to use the DXE Insulated Boom-to-Element Bracket, (DXE-BEB-2), which removes the need for any element length changes. The element is completely insulated from the boom. The antenna will perform well on the frequency for which it was designed.

The 6063-aluminum tubing can be purchased from Texas Towers; they run an ad in the back of QST each month. The 2-inch boom can be made from (2) 6-foot sections tied together with a 12-inch section of 1.875 inch tubing, which slides into each of the 6-foot sections and is held in place with 4 to 8 stainless steel sheet metal screws.

EM>Metal and Cable of Twinsburg, OH also advertises in QST and they sell 6061 tubing which since it is somewhat stronger will allow a lighter element. Their tubing is available down to .25-inch OD.

The boom to mast plate is a DX Engineering DXE-BMP-2, which is held to the boom with (2) DXE-SAD-200A stainless saddle clamps and held to the mast with similar clamps to fit whatever mast size you have in your tower.

The 2'' boom Hairpin Match, (DXE-HMS-1P) is a new item from DX Engineering and will match your 50-ohm coax to the approximately 25-ohm impedance of the driven element with minor adjustments.

The hairpin can be adjusted so that the low SWR point of the curve shown above will occur at any point in the 10m band, and since it’s a 3 element antenna, the driven element and the Hairpin will be close to the tower for easy adjustment if you change your mind.

Cutting the Tubing

Well, we have the lengths of the necessary tubing listed and diagramed above and we have a couple of sources. How do we get the tubing cut to the correct lengths and how do we mate it up? Good questions and this is where the additional tools come in.

There are many ways to cut the tubing. Some people just grab a hacksaw and put the tubing in a vise and hack away. STOP!!!! Those rough cuts at odd angles to the tubing are guaranteed to make your antenna look amateurish and second best.

The preferred way to cut aluminum tubing is to use a tubing cutter. Gee – what a concept!

The cuts will be smooth and straight and you can cut it to exactly the right length

Don’t use a cheap cutter. It will just skate over the top surface of the aluminum. You can buy a good tubing cutter at Home Depot for about $25.00. It’ll last for 20 years and if you’re the kind that builds antennas, you’ll never stop. Amortize it over the next 20 years and it comes to just over a $1.00 per year. Case closed.

The Tubing Connection

There are many ways to connect the tubing together. We have all seen the use of hose clamps. To use the hose clamps you will need to slot the tubing with a hack saw. I guarantee that if you don’t have a fixture for slotting the tubing, a nice band saw, you will end up with slots that don’t look very nice and you will also have to de-burr them to keep them from slicing your hands during assembly.

I propose the simpler, easier and better method shown in the picture below.


Tubing Connection

Put the tubing together at the correct position and drill two holes thru it. Use two stainless steel machine screws of the correct length and stainless nylon-insert locking nuts. These are available at Home Depot or your local hardware store. Why not use lock washers? Because you are tightening on an object (tubing) that will “give” as you turn the nut. You will never achieve the correct amount of compression of the lock washer or the stretch of the bolt to assure that it won’t come loose and let your aluminum-tubing fall from the sky. The nylon insert nuts will hold the assembly together no matter what. Tighten just enough to cause a slight deformation of the tubing for a firm connection.


OK - How does it work?

We mounted the antenna on the test tower where it can be rotated so that it is facing toward or away from the stationary antenna on our test range. The stationary antenna is located approximately 700 feet from the antenna under test. Both the stationary antenna and the antenna under test (AUT) are about 70 feet above ground and there is a naturally occurring ravine between the two antennas to help reduce ground reflections.

First, we test the Front-to-Back ratio by sending a signal from the stationary antenna to the AUT. We do it when the antennas are facing each other and again when the AUT is rotated by 180 degrees. The difference is noted by our HP/Agilent Network Analyzer, which saves a file to a laptop. Later we turn the file into graphs.

For the gain measurement we first measure the signal strength from the stationary antenna with a dipole for the same frequency as the Yagi. Then we replace the dipole with the AUT. The Network Analyzer makes another file and it is saved to the laptop.

Later, we import the files into Microsoft Excel and make graphs. Below are the graphs for the antenna that we designed above. The curves have been smoothed a bit but they show basically what was going on within about a half dB on the gain and within about 1 dB on the F/B ratio.


Measured Front to Back Ratio


Measured Gain Over a Dipole

The SWR curve is basically the same as shown on the design section.

The gain is about a dB more than we expected and it certainly is nice that it is somewhat constant over a large frequency range. The front-to-back ratio is better than expected as well.

We even used it for a few impromptu contacts while the antenna was on the Test Tower and we received excellent reports. This of course means nothing since we didn’t do A/B comparisons with any standard antennas but it’s reassuring, nonetheless.


So What Did All This Cost?

Here's A Listing Of The Pieces That We Used.

10M Beam Costs

Yes, you could probably find some 10m 3-element beams out there with similar prices. Let’s look at a couple of them compared to the one that we just “built”.

1 - Brand “” is the one that we just built.

  • Boom length is 11 feet 10 inches
  • Peak Observed Gain is about 7.0 dBd
  • Front-to-back – about 25-27 db peak on a line that I use to indicate average value of an otherwise peaky aspect of most Yagis.
  • Wind survival – 80 mph
  • Price is $222.86 + shipping (See Note 1)


2 – Brand-Z is sold by one of the Ham radio magazines:

  • Stated Boom length is 11 ft. 9-5/8 in.
  • Stated Gain is approximately 6.3 dBd at the peak.
  • Stated Front-to-back - 20 db
  • Stated Wind survival – 50 mph
  • Price is $256 + shipping (See Note 1)


3 – Brand-C is sold by everybody.

  • Stated Boom length is 8 feet
  • Stated Gain is 8dBd – (See Note 2)
  • Stated F/B >20db
  • Wind survival – None listed, but I entered the tubing sizes into the Element Design Tool and came up with about 95 mph.
  • Price is $199 + shipping from AES (See Note 1)


Incidentally, both Brand-C and Brand-Z use a Gamma match that will make the antenna pattern non-symmetrical. The one that we built uses a balanced feed consisting of a Hairpin match.

Note 1 - Neither of them includes a balun, so for accurate comparisons I neglected the balun in the above table.

Note 2 - The Yagi is a predictable animal, especially a 3 element Yagi where tuning options are limited. There are only so many things that you can do with just 3 elements. It is always a tradeoff between Gain, F/B and SWR. As you saw in a graph at the beginning of this article, the boom length limits the maximum possible gain. The claimed gain by Brand C exceeds the theoretical maximum possible for the stated boom length according to the graph.

There is a famous book that Yagi builders (or buyers) should own. It is called Yagi Antenna Design written by Dr. James L. Lawson, W2PV (SK), and it is sold by the ARRL. I bought mine a long time ago and paid $15.00. It is worth many, many times that amount. In my opinion, it is THE definitive Yagi work. One of the graphs shows gain as a function of boom length and is the basis of some of my comments above.

Looking at the other 10m 3-element offerings out there I would say that you could build a much better antenna for a little less money than Brand-Z and for slightly more money than the Brand-C that has a boom that appears to have a boom that is too short for the claimed gain.

The wind speed survivability of the Brand Z is about 50 mph and of Brand C is about 95 mph. The beam that we built has a rating of 80 mph. The question you have to ask is: “How long has it been since my local wind speed has exceeded 80mph?” If it was not that long ago, then use Yagi Mechanical available for purchase and download on the DX Engineering website to design an antenna that will withstand whatever wind speeds normally occur at your location.

I am sure that there are many other ways to arrange the tubing to obtain the best wind speed per dollar of expenditure. This article shows a solution based on my criteria at the time that I wrote it. You are invited to purchase Yagi Mechanical on the DX Engineering site to discover your ideal element taper.

 

I would also like to state that the purpose of this article was not to bring Brand-C or Brand-Z antennas into disrepute or say that the companies that make them are less than reputable. The purpose was to enlighten the average Ham about the mechanisms of the Yagi antenna, the ease with which he can build as good or better than he can buy and to provide some direction with regard to building practices and/or antenna selection.

So, there you have it: The whole journey from conception of the antenna to testing it on the DX Engineering Antenna Range.

Incidentally, except for adjusting the driven element and the Hairpin Match for a good SWR, this antenna was built exactly as designed. There were no “tweaks” on the antenna range. I attribute this to the insulated element brackets, which allowed us to translate the output from the YDP directly into aluminum tubing without having to allow for the element length deviation caused by metal brackets.

I have no doubt that if you were to build this antenna exactly as presented here that it would work just as well for you. And if you were to build an antenna for any other band using this design method and insulated boom-to-element brackets that similar results could be obtained.

I wish you the best of luck on all of your antenna projects!

73 and Good DX,

Paul, NO8D
DX Engineering


6M 3-Element Yagi Plans
20M 3-Element Yagi Plans
Call Toll Free: 800-777-0703
Announcements
Contact Information
New Products
new products
. David Stone
K8IS
Parkersburg, West Virginia
USA
Get more information about this antenna >>
Be an Antenna Superstar!
You put a lot of time and effort into designing and building your DX Engineering-equipped antenna. So why not show the world what you have created by submitting it to the DX Engineering Antenna Showcase? It’s easy to do, too. Just click on the Entry icon above, fill out the information form--don't forget to include information about the DX Engineering products used on your antenna, attach some photos, and presto!--you’re an antenna superstar!

Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Site Map
Copyright 2009 by PDS Electronics, Inc. dba DX Engineering